After We Fell

After We Fell

You must need to login..!

Description

Just as Tessa’s life begins to become unglued, nothing is what she thought it would be. Not her friends nor her family. The only person that she should be able to rely on is Hardin, who is furious when he discovers the massive secret that she’s been keeping. Before Tessa makes the biggest decision of her life, everything changes because of revelations about her family.

Credits: TheMovieDb.

Image

695 comments on “After We Fell

  1. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  2. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  3. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  4. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  5. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  6. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  7. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  8. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  9. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  10. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  11. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  12. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  13. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  14. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  15. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  16. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  17. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  18. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  19. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  20. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  21. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  22. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  23. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  24. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  25. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  26. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  27. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  28. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  29. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  30. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  31. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  32. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  33. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  34. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  35. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  36. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  37. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  38. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  39. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  40. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  41. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  42. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  43. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  44. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  45. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  46. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  47. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  48. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  49. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  50. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  51. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  52. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  53. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  54. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  55. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  56. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  57. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  58. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  59. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  60. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  61. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  62. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  63. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  64. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  65. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  66. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  67. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  68. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  69. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  70. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  71. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  72. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  73. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  74. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  75. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  76. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  77. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  78. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  79. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  80. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  81. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  82. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  83. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  84. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  85. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  86. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  87. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  88. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  89. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  90. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  91. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  92. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  93. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  94. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  95. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  96. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  97. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  98. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  99. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  100. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  101. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  102. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  103. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  104. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  105. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  106. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  107. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  108. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  109. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  110. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  111. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  112. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  113. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  114. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  115. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  116. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  117. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  118. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  119. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  120. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  121. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  122. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  123. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  124. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  125. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  126. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  127. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  128. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  129. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  130. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  131. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  132. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  133. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  134. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  135. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  136. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  137. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  138. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  139. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  140. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  141. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  142. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  143. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  144. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  145. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  146. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  147. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  148. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  149. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  150. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  151. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  152. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  153. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  154. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  155. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  156. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  157. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  158. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  159. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  160. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  161. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  162. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  163. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  164. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  165. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  166. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  167. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  168. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  169. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  170. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  171. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  172. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  173. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  174. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  175. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  176. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  177. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  178. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  179. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  180. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  181. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  182. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  183. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  184. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  185. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  186. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  187. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  188. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  189. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  190. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  191. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  192. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  193. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  194. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  195. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  196. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  197. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  198. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  199. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  200. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  201. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  202. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  203. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  204. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  205. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  206. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  207. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  208. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  209. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  210. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  211. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  212. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  213. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  214. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  215. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  216. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  217. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  218. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  219. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  220. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  221. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  222. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  223. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  224. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  225. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  226. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  227. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  228. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  229. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  230. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  231. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  232. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  233. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  234. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  235. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  236. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  237. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  238. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  239. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  240. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  241. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  242. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  243. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  244. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  245. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  246. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  247. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  248. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  249. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  250. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  251. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  252. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  253. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  254. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  255. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  256. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  257. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  258. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  259. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  260. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  261. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  262. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  263. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  264. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  265. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  266. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  267. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  268. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  269. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  270. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  271. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  272. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  273. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  274. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  275. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  276. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  277. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  278. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  279. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  280. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  281. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  282. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  283. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  284. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  285. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  286. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  287. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  288. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  289. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  290. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  291. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  292. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  293. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  294. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  295. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  296. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  297. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  298. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  299. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  300. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  301. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  302. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  303. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  304. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  305. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  306. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  307. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  308. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  309. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  310. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  311. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  312. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  313. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  314. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  315. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  316. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  317. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  318. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  319. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  320. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  321. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  322. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  323. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  324. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  325. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  326. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  327. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  328. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  329. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  330. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  331. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  332. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  333. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  334. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  335. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  336. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  337. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  338. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  339. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  340. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  341. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  342. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  343. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  344. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  345. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  346. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  347. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  348. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  349. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  350. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  351. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  352. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  353. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  354. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  355. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  356. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  357. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  358. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  359. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  360. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  361. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  362. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  363. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  364. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  365. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  366. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  367. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  368. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  369. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  370. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  371. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  372. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  373. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  374. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  375. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  376. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  377. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  378. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  379. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  380. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  381. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  382. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  383. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  384. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  385. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  386. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  387. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  388. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  389. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  390. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  391. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  392. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  393. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  394. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  395. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  396. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  397. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  398. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  399. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  400. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  401. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  402. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  403. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  404. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  405. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  406. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  407. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  408. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  409. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  410. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  411. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  412. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  413. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  414. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  415. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  416. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  417. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  418. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  419. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  420. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  421. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  422. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  423. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  424. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  425. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  426. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  427. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  428. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  429. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  430. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  431. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  432. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  433. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  434. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  435. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  436. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  437. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  438. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  439. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  440. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  441. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  442. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  443. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  444. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  445. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  446. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  447. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  448. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  449. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  450. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  451. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  452. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  453. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  454. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  455. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  456. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  457. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  458. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  459. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  460. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  461. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  462. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  463. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  464. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  465. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  466. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  467. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  468. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  469. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  470. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  471. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  472. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  473. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  474. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  475. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  476. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  477. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  478. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  479. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  480. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  481. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  482. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  483. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  484. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  485. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  486. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  487. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  488. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  489. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  490. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  491. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  492. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  493. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  494. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  495. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  496. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  497. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  498. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  499. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  500. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  501. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  502. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  503. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  504. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  505. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  506. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  507. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  508. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  509. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  510. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  511. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  512. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  513. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  514. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  515. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  516. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  517. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  518. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  519. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  520. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  521. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  522. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  523. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  524. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  525. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  526. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  527. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  528. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  529. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  530. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  531. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  532. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  533. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  534. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  535. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  536. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  537. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  538. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  539. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  540. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  541. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  542. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  543. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  544. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  545. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  546. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  547. SkyRo85 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  548. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  549. SkyRo85 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  550. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  551. SkyRo85 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  552. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  553. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  554. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  555. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  556. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  557. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  558. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  559. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  560. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  561. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  562. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  563. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  564. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  565. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  566. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  567. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  568. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  569. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  570. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  571. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  572. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  573. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  574. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  575. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  576. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  577. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  578. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  579. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  580. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  581. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  582. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  583. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  584. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  585. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  586. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  587. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  588. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  589. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  590. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  591. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  592. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  593. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  594. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  595. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  596. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  597. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  598. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  599. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  600. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  601. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  602. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  603. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  604. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  605. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  606. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  607. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  608. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  609. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  610. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  611. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  612. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  613. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  614. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  615. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  616. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  617. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  618. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  619. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  620. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  621. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  622. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  623. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  624. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  625. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  626. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  627. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  628. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  629. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  630. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  631. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  632. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  633. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  634. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  635. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  636. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  637. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  638. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  639. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  640. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  641. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  642. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  643. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  644. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  645. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  646. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  647. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  648. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  649. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  650. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  651. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  652. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  653. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  654. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  655. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  656. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  657. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  658. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  659. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  660. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  661. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  662. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  663. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  664. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  665. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  666. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  667. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  668. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  669. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  670. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  671. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  672. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  673. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  674. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  675. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  676. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  677. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  678. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  679. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  680. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  681. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  682. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  683. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  684. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  685. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  686. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  687. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  688. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  689. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  690. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  691. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  692. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  693. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply
  694. CinemaSerf on

    I seem to recall seeing the previous episode of this trilogy in the cinema – a beneficiary of the lockdown dearth that propelled some serious dross onto the big screen. This, mercifully, never found a home there and so could be watched, half-heartedly, from the comfort of my own living room. The rather uninspiring, self-indulgent characterisations of “Tess” (Josephine Langford) and “Hardin” (Hero Fiennes Tiffin) continue to vacillate from loving to loathing each other for reasons that continued to escape me after the first two films. The narrative reminded me of a visualisation of letters one might have written to a lonely hearts column – each problem being acted out on screen by the pair, before the scenario resets (for good or ill) and off we go again. To be fair, they are both quite easy on the eye, but their frequent, creatively photographed, sex scenes accompanied by some mediocre AOR soundtrack quickly start to wear thin. Perhaps I am just too old for this, but I just found their on/off relationship, their secret keeping about things that couldn’t matter a jot to anyone, let alone to those who purport to “love” one and other, really boring. The truly stilted dialogue and delivery (especially from HFT, complete with a his unique set of “letraset” tattoos) ) contrive to make this a real dirge of a watch. Watch out, there’s another one coming too….

    Reply
  695. tmdb51616167 on

    This is the point in the movie where everything goes haywire, veering off a cliff into confusion, leaving you wondering what you’re even watching.

    Felt like a repetition without the depth of a storyline, filled with plot holes and rushed scenes that felt forced.

    If you’re going to commit to a franchise, then commit wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, this installment falls short, making it the weakest link in the trilogy.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *